Bryant's summary of Kant's a priori synthetic judgments

Prof. Levi Bryant, in his manifesto for onticology, summarizes Kant's explanation of the possibility of a priori synthetic judgments:

Kant’s argument consisted in claiming that mind imposes the forms of space and time on the data of experience. In other words, space and time are not attributes of being itself but rather of the mind that regards being. Insofar, Kant argues, as mathematics is ultimately a rumination on the nature of space and time taken in their most abstract form and insofar as the mind imposes space and time on the manifold of sensation, it thus follows that a priori judgments about the nature of spatio-temporal relations are possible that anticipate the structure of actual-space times without directly experiencing these space-times. Why? Because any manifold of sensation must necessarily be structured by these forms imposed by intuition.

 

I study philosophy and social theory at the University of South Florida. I am also a photographer, map lover and sometimes poet.